drcontrarian

life as you don't know it

A final contribution on TAFE

Let me reiterate, I support public education. I know many very good TAFE teachers. In fact, I can’t actually think of one that is below par. It will be a real pity if the TAFE system is broken in the process.

The debate that is happening (in the twitterverse at least) has a few themes which are disappointing and annoying, and I don’t believe it is doing the cause an injustice.:

  • Don’t touch us/leave us alone – we are beyond reproach
  • We are the good guys, and ‘they’ are the bad guys
  • Only we can do this job, no-one else
  • If you cut the funding the culturally disadvantaged will suffer
  • Time spent on a course is the important indicator of quality outcome

These themes as well as the glaring obvious fact that nothing previously galvanised the TAFE community to this extent.

  • Where is the passion for better technology?
  • Where is the passion for lower rates for students? 
  • Where is the passion to raise standards? 
  • Where is the passion to develop new curricula?

I am not saying the passion is not there – within individuals – but the lack of visibility for those causes casts serious doubts on the veracity of the claims that these passions are there.

It would be much better if the agitators for this cause could actually make some constructive suggestions about:

How waste can minimised (beyond blaming private RTOs)

How the system can be improved

The real (not imagined) consequences of pending changes.

All of the above can be supported by students, community members and above all some facts and reasoned thinking.

Waving flags in the street looks like a union-led response to job insecurity, rather than a genuine concern for educational foundation of our nation.

Not sure why I try to have this debate, because I am one of the ‘bad’ guys…, right?

5 Questions for TAFE

Assumption #1: Governments will never reduce funding on any project/institution if it is going to cost them a vote; which means that they have to trade off one cause over another.

Question #1: Which institution should be punished instead of TAFE?

Assumption #2: The government gets its money from the community and the community is suffering right now.

Question #2: Do you think the community has the capacity to keep paying - and to pay more? Or even wants to?

Assumption #3: No system is perfect.

Question #3: Do you think there are NO inefficiencies in the TAFE system and/or that the Government is entitled to flush these out?

Assumption #4: TAFE thinks that the government supports RTOs - or even that this is done at the expense of TAFE.

Question #4: Do you think a private (tax paying) organisation is automatically less worthy than a private one?

Assumption #5: Educators are educated people capable of identify the real problem and offering real solutions based on rational, considered insight.

Question #5: Why do I only hear ‘stop doing this to me’ - and no alternative or actual solution? (See question #1.)

PS - A NOTE:

You may be surprised to hear that, competitive grants aside, the GVT does NOT sponsor private RTOs or pay RTOs anything. They pay the BUSINESSES to thave the ir employees trained. These SAME businesses are there for TAFE to approach - because it is apparently quite easy to make a lot of money.

When educators cry wolf…

In Aus (VIC in particular) there is a huge uproar amongst the TAFE staff and the like about plans of the government in that state to slash funding.

For the record:

  • I believe public schooling is crucial to a country’s long term prosperity. I went to a public school and so did all my children.
  • I have a financial interest in a private RTO, although the amount of money we make through that would be less than $10K per annum.

But I find a few things interesting about this ‘debate’/ backlash.

The anti-government uprising is extremely biased, with NO RECOGNITION of ANY validity of the Government’s plans/actions. THAT is not the kind of biased teacher/teaching I would like to think we have in the system.

The vocal response appears to have been generated by the possibility of job losses and maybe TAFE closures. Where is this passion and commitment and ACTION when it I required to innovate and change and adapt and push the boundaries of teaching?

The concern rings hollow when it is so directly related to job-security, but not to the function and disciplines of teaching. I have a message for teachers: the public system is not and should not be immune to the pressures and tribulations of the general community.

As I write this, auto workers and investment bankers are being laid off by the thousands. In what universe must the teacher be somehow spared this? I would think that governments would have a responsibility to cut spending and something has to go… and I pretty confident that the nurses and police would also shout doom+gloom from the roofs if they had to be trimmed.

Reducing access to education (and education and training, NOT just the public variety) would be less than ideal at ANY time. 

Public servants understandably may not be used having to experience the pain of unemployment like us other mortals - but maybe it is time to get used to that idea.

Go and start a private RTO and see if you enjoy life with the other pigs at the trough of funding you are so vocal about. 

What you don’t get on social media is…

Debate.

I have been on Twitter since Feb 2009 (more than 3 years) and I have been on Facebook since probably 2007.

You see people sharing.

You see people re-tweeting and passing along.

You see people commenting.

You see people complimenting each other 

… and generally falling over themselves to be nice to each other.

It seems everybody will do anything for a LIKE or a RT -

EXCEPT be honest.

SOOOOOO much of it crap. So much much is open for debate and discussion. But the ‘friends’ and the ‘tweeps’ will have none of that.

How many tweets/posts/updates can one tolerate about >

  • - the secret to winning more followers
  • - 5 things a leader must do
  • - 3 reasons why you should encourage failure
  • - engage your community
  • - the way to wow customer service
  • - blaah blah de blah

Or quotes from Ghandi, Churchill or Steve Jobs.

Seriously is it so hard to be ORIGINAL or SHUT UP? 

Don’t just re-hash the same things that have been said a hundred times qand think that constitutes a conversation!

If anyone has unfollowed you because you have disagreed, let me know and I will follow you.

Where are the Mavericks???

And I am not talking about the fake mavericks who adopt ‘the brand’. I want to see some fighting words. Some freaking arguments and disagreements.

Because THAT is how you stress-test ideas.

There is only so much candy one can take, right?.

In 2011 I wrote this comparison between South African and Australian socio-political issues.

Looking back, it seems nothing has changed in 10 years…

In 2011 I wrote this comparison between South African and Australian socio-political issues.

Looking back, it seems nothing has changed in 10 years…

10 years ago exactly, I wrote this…

I now travel North every day to my new job in the city.

The more things change the more it stays the same.

There is always unfinished business, but nevertheless I have to move on.

I work, I write. Moonyeen teaches and mothers. Lauraine swims and Megan plays tennis. Matthew Dennis still does crazy things.

We have a system going, and we look out for the paradox, for the unintended consequence. But even so, shit still happens.

In the meantime life just goes on. Regardless.

Life just is.

 

02-02-02

Jesus vs Religion

When spending time with the family is an exercise in branding

TripleM is having a family day at Lunar Park. Initiated by the ‘Grill Team’ (breakfast show) in response to the sad death of Kristian Anderson; which raises an important question:

Are you for real Austereo, or is this a marketing exercise?

It could be legit; there is some evidence that Geyer is a good bloke, and possibly the other boys too. Or it could be a cynical exercise in market positioning, which seems to be more likely. So following the standard operating procedures of all the great crime shows, lets investigate:

Firstly, there is apparent motive: The overall positioning for the program is at the boofy end of blokey, aimed at the archetypical Western Sydneysider - the type that exists in market research data that apparently proves that the vast majority of people who know where St.Clair is also wear checked shirts, have mullets and drink VB.

The Luna Park gig seems to be the perfect opportunity to nuance their positioning with feminine touch.

Secondly, there is the opportunity: The program often offers risque content and there is distinct likelihood that the program may be alienating families and chicks (as they are fondly referred to in programming meetings.)  With advertisers being so jittery about Kyle & Jackie O’s show, the timing could not be better. (Both radio stations may belong to the same stable, but I am certain they have a brief to compete – and they would rather keep the ad dollars under their banner than see it flow to an external competitor.

When they chanced upon the sad story of a young guy dying from bowel cancer, the opportunity to show the ‘softer side’ of the blokes (for commercial reasons) would have been tempting.

Thirdly, the evidence: The death of Kristian was sad, I am sure, for all who knew him and those who could relate, but calling it a tragedy smacks of media hyperbole, not compassion. As experts in communication you would know that a ‘tragedy’ is defined by that great dictionary in the cloud as either:

[] An event causing great suffering, destruction, and distress, such as a serious accident, crime, or natural catastrophe.

[] A play dealing with tragic events and having an unhappy ending, esp. one concerning the downfall of the main character.

I don’t think either of these applies.

Furthermore, in my mind there is just a hint of exploitation. When a dying person expresses the desire to (have spent) or spend more time with their families it is because they are fearful and lonely. They want the one thing they can’t have – and being able to spend time with your loved ones would be a reinforcement of the fact you are alive.

When you have to deal with your impending death, you (and your family) are experiencing the most traumatic end emotional imaginable.

I did not know Kristian, so I am not speaking for him; but generally speaking – and thinking logically, wanting to spend more time with loved ones is a selfish act borne out of fear of the unknown. 

Before you send hate mail: I don’t know why Mr Anderson really chose to make his suffering and his dying wishes public. I have said nothing and intend to say nothing about that. But is no justification for TripleM to turn it into a band wagon to ride to Luna Park via the hearts of Western Sydney.

I may be grumpy cynic, but I will believe their efforts are legitimate (albeit misguided) if they can tell me that Austero or the presenters are paying all costs and they did not hit up sponsors for cash or in-kind donations.

In which case I would apologise for casting aspersions. Except for the part of not knowing what a ‘tragedy’ is. They really should know better.

I wonder if she remembers?

What do you do Dad?

“What exactly do you do, Dad?” Lauraine does come up with some weird questions. It was 5h15 in the morning and we are scooting down President Ave to the Sutherland Aquatic Centre and the 2008 Olympics. This early morning trip was a special time that we shared, but she does have the father’s knack for asking strange questions at difficult times.

“I manage the shopping centre.”

“Are you the boss?” Already status conscious at this age.

“Well, kind of… I am the boss there but I have a boss and he has a boss. Basically everybody’s got a boss. Even the big boss has to listen to the owners and the shareholders.” Goodness I am far down the food chain.

“Can you fire people, but?” Spoken like a true Aussie, ending her sentences with the ‘but’ preposition.

“Yes.”

“Have you ever fired someone?”

“Yes, but it was a long time ago.” She was really asking weird questions.

“I won’t like that. I also won’t like being a fireman or a policeman, because you would have to go out in the dark, like now”. Looking out the window, now. Don’t know the purpose of the questions, but can’t resist the opportunity to moralise.

“That’s why we came to Australia. You can be anything you like. If you want to study snails at the bottom of the ocean, you can do that. It is a first world country.”

“Yuk, I would not do that…”

I smiled.